Live Proxies
Residential proxy provider positioned on curated pools for demanding targets.
Last reviewed · Reviewed quarterly · How we assess
Editorial take
Positioned around curated, higher-quality residential pools.
Best for
Buyers wanting curated pool quality.
Less ideal for
Rock-bottom budget shoppers.
At a glance
| Tier | mid-market |
|---|---|
| Status | Active |
| Billing models | per-GB, subscription |
| Starting price | Not publicly disclosed |
| Traffic expiry | Not publicly disclosed |
| Provider-reported pool size | Not publicly disclosed |
| Countries / locations | Not publicly disclosed |
| Country targeting | Not publicly disclosed |
| City targeting | Not publicly disclosed |
| ASN targeting | Not publicly disclosed |
| Protocols | HTTP, HTTPS |
| Per-request rotation | Not publicly disclosed |
| Max sticky session | Not publicly disclosed |
| Authentication | username/password |
| Dashboard | Yes |
| API | Yes |
| Trial | Not publicly disclosed |
| Refund policy | Not publicly disclosed |
| Support channels | Not publicly disclosed |
| Account manager | Not publicly disclosed |
| Acceptable-use policy | Not publicly disclosed |
Evidence & scoring
Our score reflects how completely Live Proxies discloses key facts, weighted by our rubric. It is decision-support, not a performance benchmark.
Insufficient evidence for a score
Live Proxies currently discloses too few public facts for a reliable rubric score (3/16 key fields). We show what is known and mark the rest as not disclosed rather than guessing.
Sources
Sources pending verification
We have not yet published verified source citations for Live Proxies. Volatile facts on this page are marked “Not publicly disclosed” until an editor confirms them against the provider's official documentation and records a source and date. See our methodology and corrections policy.
Spotted something out of date? See our corrections policy or get in touch.
Compare Live Proxies head-to-head
Popular side-by-side comparisons involving Live Proxies.